Thats what we’re looking at right here. With single-digit miles on the clock, this 1967 Ford Mustang Fastback Eleanor is a fresh build and the product of about 1,200 hours of labor to reconstruct a solid, rust-free 1967 Mustang shell into a tribute that’s close enough to the original that it could probably get work as its silver-screen In1969, the Mustang got bigger still—3.8-inches longer and half an inch wider, with no change in the 108-inch wheelbase. Ford dropped the 289 and added a new 351-cid (5.8-liter) V-8 with 250 or

TheDuo. It’s the classic tale of David versus Goliath, the super star versus the up-and-coming. In one corner sits the defending champ, the blue ’67 Fastback, eager to keep his title. And in

1968Shelby Mustang GT350 Fastback / Source: Bonhams. All 1968 Mustang GT featured the new GT logos and emblems along with fog lamps, dual exhaust system, GT stripe, heavy-duty suspension, wide Absolutely the '67 would be worth far more. Why, because I like them better than '68's!! Seriously, they both are worth a lot these days. Some prefer one, some the Withat least 375 horsepower on tap, the V8 Tokyo Drift Mustangs could spin their tires with ease — and would, no matter what. The beaten and battered Mustang got to 60 mph in 6.7 seconds and 14-mile ET: 15.2 seconds @ 91 MPH. *From a November 1966 Car & Driver test of a 1967 Mustang 390 GTA with AT and A/C. Alternatively, in March 1967, Hot Rod tested a 1967 Mustang 390 GTA with AT, 3.25 rear end and California emissions, for a ¼-mile ET of 15.31 @ 93 MPH. This '67 fastback aptly demonstrates the appeal of BlJJ.
  • 5ainz1940y.pages.dev/273
  • 5ainz1940y.pages.dev/398
  • 5ainz1940y.pages.dev/54
  • 5ainz1940y.pages.dev/222
  • 5ainz1940y.pages.dev/99
  • 5ainz1940y.pages.dev/49
  • 5ainz1940y.pages.dev/392
  • 5ainz1940y.pages.dev/234
  • 5ainz1940y.pages.dev/178

    • 65 vs 67 mustang fastback